Proven Science

Frequently Asked Questions

What are trace minerals?
Trace minerals are required by animals in small amounts - usually only milligrams per day. Common examples are zinc, copper, cobalt, iodine, selenium and manganese. In comparison, macro minerals are required in larger amounts - usually grams per day. Typical macro minerals include calcium, phosphorous, magnesium and potassium.
What determines a Performance Mineral?
There are two basic categories of trace minerals: performance minerals and ordinary minerals. To determine if a trace mineral is a performance mineral, there are five essential criteria that must be met: return, response, repeatability, research and reassurance.
What defines an ordinary or standard mineral?

Criteria for these minerals are:

  • Do not meet the five essential performance mineral criteria.
  • Provide basic trace mineral nutrition to prevent deficiency and maintain normal life and growth functions of animals.
  • Have no research to prove performance responses above and beyond typical sulfate mineral sources.

In addition, some of these minerals have different product characteristics such as particle size, solubility, dustiness, palatability and different bioavailability values.

What does this mean to the industry?
In recent years, the confusion level about mineral efficacy has increased dramatically. The performance minerals' categorization is designed to help the animal feed industry evaluate trace minerals based on legitimate performance criteria and dismiss unsubstantiated, outrageous claims.
How can nutritionists and producers benefit from the performance minerals classification?
Nutritionists and producers can use the essential performance mineral criteria to evaluate mineral sources. If a supplier represents their products as "performance minerals", ask them to verify how they meet all five criteria. Then you will know.
Do only Zinpro products currently meet performance mineral standards?
Copper sulfate and zinc oxide, when fed at specific growth promotant levels for swine (and some poultry), also may meet these standards. This also assumes that the supplier of these trace minerals meet all five essential performance criteria.
Are Zinpro products really that different from ordinary trace mineral products?
Zinpro products are uniquely designed and manufactured to be the highest bioavailable trace mineral products on the market and are therefore performance minerals by nature. Zinpro's products and manufacturing processes are patented and meet the five essential performance mineral criteria (5-Rs). As a result, there is a huge difference between Zinpro Performance Minerals® and ordinary trace minerals.
How important is bioavailability?
Bioavailability is a relative value placed on the ability of a mineral to be absorbed and metabolized. However, bioavailability alone is not enough to be considered a performance mineral. All minerals are bioavailable to a certain extent, although true animal performance cannot be extrapolated based on bioavailability data alone. Also, it is not scientifically acceptable to compare bioavailability values between different studies.
If Zinpro products are 2-3 times more bioavailable than ordinary sulfate and oxide sources, can't I use 2-3 times more of these ordinary minerals and get the same response for less money?
No. Simply increasing levels of sulfates, oxides or any other basic minerals does not guarantee the same level of animal response as seen with Zinpro Performance Minerals®. In fact, by feeding elevated levels of a standard mineral, animal performance will most likely decline rather than increase. This is primarily due to the animal's nutritional requirements for a balanced diet and specific ratios between trace minerals.
How do you correlate the price to the value of Zinpro products?
The price of any trace mineral should be correlated directly to the nutritional value that mineral brings to the animal feed operation. Zinpro products are engineered to produce animal performance benefits that translate into improved profitability (ROI) substantiated by industry-leading research.
Once a trace mineral is approved by AAFCO, doesn't that mean it's a good product, or at least similar to a performance mineral?

No. AAFCO definitions have limited usefulness for nutritionists and producers in making animal performance decisions. AAFCO only provides a molecular description of various terminologies. The various organic trace mineral technologies described by AAFCO have two things in common:

  • A carbon atom in their molecular structure, derived from protein, amino acid(s) or carbohydrates.
  • A more expensive cost structure than organic trace minerals.
According to AAFCO definitions, Zinpro has 1 amino acid, chelates have 1-3 amino acids and proteinates have 1-8 amino acids or a protein. Is there really a difference between them?
To a biochemist, there's a huge difference but to a nutritionists or livestock producer the only true value is animal performance and return on investment. And these two criteria are only achieved by quality research that supports the specific product. That's where Zinpro Performance Minerals® stand apart from all other mineral sources.